Trump, Donald J

House Democrats Can’t Impeach Trump, but They’re Willing to Try

Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr

Mr. Green’s articles of impeachment have company. Representative Steve Cohen, Democrat of Tennessee, plans to introduce his own impeachment articles in the coming weeks. Brad Sherman, Democrat of California, did so in July. And other Democrats in the House, where impeachment proceedings must begin, say they will not be far behind.

“Impeachment is what people understand,” Mr. Cohen said in a recent interview.

The resolutions have no real chance of advancing in the House — a fact that has not been lost on Democrats. Impeachment resolutions are typically referred to the House Judiciary Committee, which serves as the first place for debate and investigation into whether the articles warrant a full hearing by the House. With the Republicans in firm control of the chamber — and the Judiciary Committee gavel — the chance that they receive any real hearing there is next to none.


Representatives Al Green, Democrat of Texas, released on Wednesday articles of impeachment against President Trump.

OPEN Document

Thus far, Democratic leaders in the House have urged their colleagues to wait for investigators to do their work. For one, pushing impeachment too early could weaken Democrats’ hand if investigators turn up persuasive evidence of “high crimes and misdemeanors” that could compel bipartisan action. Too great a focus on impeachment could also distract from Democrats’ attempts to put forward a strong economic message.

“The Democratic Party had best be identified with something more than impeachment,” said Dennis J. Kucinich, a former Democratic representative.

In 2008, Mr. Kucinich offered 35 articles of impeachment against President George W. Bush, focused primarily on his handling of the Iraq War. Mr. Kucinich cautioned that resolutions this time around might not yet be supported.

“There is tremendous animosity toward the president, and I understand it,” Mr. Kucinich said. “But I don’t know if there is a sufficient case to warrant a process as vigorous as impeachment.”

Others offered a different warning: In exciting their own base, which they need to regain control of the House next year, Democrats run the risk of igniting Mr. Trump’s.

Something similar happened to President Bill Clinton when he was embroiled in an impeachment fight in the late 1990s. His poll numbers went up and Republicans lost seats in the House.

Recent public polling has found that about 40 percent of Americans support impeachment, but Bill Burton, a former aide in the Obama White House and Democratic campaign operative, said much of that support was pocketed in blue districts.

“There is a growing appetite for impeachment in the most Democratic parts of the country,” he said. “But what is good for downtown L.A. is not what’s good for Bakersfield.”

Those introducing the articles say they felt obliged to act. Their efforts got a lift on Wednesday when Tom Steyer, a prominent Democratic donor from California, wrote a letter demanding lawmakers and Democratic candidates support the president’s removal.

“I’ve got a very safe district that is very supportive of impeachment, I believe,” said Mr. Cohen, whose Memphis district is majority black. “And if I can’t come out for impeachment, then how can I expect these Republicans come out for impeachment?”

Mr. Cohen had initially tried what he calls “impeachment light” — a resolution of no confidence in Mr. Trump. But after the violence in Charlottesville, Va., and Mr. Trump’s ensuing comments, he said he could no longer wait.

Mr. Sherman, who represents part of San Fernando Valley, in California, first drafted his impeachment article in June, after Mr. Trump fired James B. Comey as F.B.I. director. He is realistic about his measure’s chances, at least until Mr. Mueller produces evidence or Mr. Trump angers his own party, but said there was too high a risk of damage in the meantime.

“At this stage, my articles are not causing the removal of the president of the United States,” Mr. Sherman said. They are, he said, “speaking for and galvanizing those people who are appalled at the recklessness and the incompetency.”

Mr. Green, for his part, framed his decision to proceed with the articles in more personal terms. After Mr. Trump used an expletive last month to describe football players who kneel or sit during the national anthem to raise awareness of police brutality and racial injustice, “I concluded that this was the last straw,” Mr. Green said. The president has a “demonstrable history of inciting white supremacy, sexism, bigotry, hate, xenophobia, race baiting and racism.”

Mr. Green stopped short of introducing his articles on Wednesday, denying Republicans the ability, at least for now, to vote to set them aside. But he read the charges, laced with Mr. Trump’s own words, from the House floor.

“I ask no one to support what I am doing,” Mr. Green said during the interview. “I believe that there are times when you have to stand alone.”

Continue reading the main story

Wendy Pettit

Wendy Pettit is a writer for NYT and writes for other publications on her spare time. She lives in Chicago with her husband and her dog Zuko.

Write A Comment

%d bloggers like this: